Join
today
Boliven PRO is more than just patent search
- Build and save lists using the powerful Lists feature
- Analyze and download your search results
- Share patent search results with your clients
Patents »
US6432107: Enhanced surface area spinal fusion devices
Filing Information
Patent Family
22 Claims, 7 Drawings
Abstract
Enhanced surface area spinal fusion devices have upper and lower sections which are implanted directly within the bodies of the vertebrae being fused, thereby surrounding the implanted sections with cancellous bone which is more conducive to ingrowth and permanent fusion. A preferred device comprises a frame-like structure composed of biocompatible material such as carbon fiber, the structure having a substantially hollow interior and open side walls or apertures to receive bone-graft material. The device is preferably used in conjunction with adjoining intervertebral cages, which may be rigidly joined to one another and/or to the inventive device. One or more physical features are also preferably provided to engage with surrounding bone or minimize back-out, such features including teeth, ridges, grooves, or outriggers. One or more shape-memory elements may also be used, each of which is preferably compressed for insertion then expanded when the device is in place. The inventive fixation device need not be employed between adjacent vertebra, but may be used between vertebra separated by one or more intermediate vertebra, in which case the device extends through the intermediate vertebra, preferably in intimate contact therewith. Multiple devices may also be implanted side by side between the same set of adjacent vertebra. In addition to these various alternative embodiments of the invention, a preferred method if installation is also disclosed.
- 1. An enhanced surface area spinal fusion device adapted for use between an upper vertebral body having an inferior vertebral endplate and a lower vertebral body having a superior endplate, wherein the interior of each body is composed of cancellous bone and each endplate is composed of cortical bone, with the distance between the endplates defining at least one intervertebral spacing, the device comprising:
biocompatible structure having an outer surface conducive to bone ingrowth and two end surfaces; and
wherein the structure is composed of one or more pieces of natural bone taken from the upper and lower bodies having been modified to receive the structure and the end surfaces of the structure define a height which is greater than the intervertebral spacing, such that when implanted, at least a portion of the device extends substantially beyond the superior endplate, the inferior endplate, or both, thereby penetrating into one or both of the upper and lower vertebra bodies and through the cortical bone, such that the end surface and outer surface of the penetrating portion are surrounded by cancellous bone.
- 4. An enhanced surface area spinal fusion device adapted for use between an upper vertebral body having an inferior vertebral endplate and a lower vertebral body having a superior endplate, wherein the interior of each body is composed of cancellous bone and each endplate is composed of cortical bone, with the distance between the endplates defining at least one intervertebral spacing, the device comprising:
a biocompatible structure having an outer surface conducive to bone ingrowth and two end surfaces defining a height which is greater than the intervertebral spacing, such that when implanted, at least a portion of the device extends substantially beyond the superior endplate, the inferior endplate, or both, thereby penetrating into one or both of the upper and lower vertebral bodies and through the cortical bone, such that the end surface and outer surface of the penetrating portion arm surrounded by cancellous bone; and
one or more distraction devices positioned between the vertebral endplates.
- 8. An enhanced surface area spinal fusion device adapted for use between an upper vertebral body having an inferior vertebral endplate and a lower vertebral body having a superior endplate, wherein the interior of each body is composed of cancellous bone and each endplate is composed of cortical bone, with the distance between the endplates defining at least one intervertebral spacing, the device comprising:
a biocompatible structure having an outer surface conducive to bone ingrowth and two end surfaces defining a height which is greater than the intervertebral spacing, such that when implanted, at least a portion of the device extends substantially beyond the superior endplate, the inferior endplate, or both, thereby penetrating into one or both of the upper and lower vertebral bodies and through the cortical bone, such that the end surface and outer surface of the penetrating portion are surrounded by cancellous bone; and
one or more intervertebral cages integrally formed with the device.
- 9. An enhanced surface area spinal fusion device adapted for use between an upper vertebral body having an inferior vertebral endplate and a lower vertebra body having a superior endplate, wherein the interior of each body is composed of cancellous bone and each endplate is composed of cortical bone, with the distance between the endplates defining at least one intervertebral spacing, the device comprising:
a biocompatible structure having an outer surface conducive to bone ingrowth and two end surfaces defining a height which is greater than the intervertebral spacing, such that when implanted, at least a portion of the device extends substantially beyond the superior endplate, the inferior endplate, or both, thereby penetrating into one or both of the upper and lower vertebral bodies and through the cortical bone, such that the end surface and outer surface of the penetrating portion are surrounded by cancellous bone; and
one or more physical features to engage with surrounding bone to minimize back-out, at least one shape memory element which is compressed for insertion of the device and expanded when the device is in place.
- 11. An enhanced surface area spinal fusion device adapted for use between an upper vertebral body having an inferior vertebral endplate and a lower vertebral body having a superior endplate, wherein the interior of each body is composed of cancellous bone and each endplate is composed of cortical bone, with the distance between the endplates defining at least one intervertebral spacing, the device comprising:
a biocompatible structure having an outer surface conducive to bone ingrowth and two end surfaces defining a height which is greater than the intervertebral spacing, such that when implanted, at least a portion of the device extends substantially beyond the superior endplate, the inferior endplate, or both, thereby penetrating into one or both of the upper and lower vertebral bodies and through the cortical bone, such that the end surface and outer surface of the penetrating portion are surrounded by cancellous bone; and
wherein the structure extends through one or more intermediate vertebra located between the upper and lower vertebra.
- 12. A system for promoting fusion between an upper vertebra having an inferior vertebral endplate and a lower vertebra having a superior endplate, the distance between the endplates defining at least one intervertebral spacing, the system comprising:
a biocompatible strut having an outer surface conducive to bone ingrowth and a height which is at least slightly greater than the intervertebral spacing, such that when the device is installed between the upper and lower vertebra, at least a portion of the device extends beyond the superior endplate, the inferior endplate, or both, thereby penetrating into cancellous bone; and
one or more distraction devices positioned adjacent the strut without penetrating the vertebral endplates.
References Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
* cited by examiner
Referenced By
| Document Number | Assignee | Inventors | Issue/Pub Date |
|
US7291170
|
LDR Medical
|
Jean Huppert
|
Nov 2007
|
|
USD524942
|
FELIX BRENT A
|
Brent A. Felix
|
Jul 2006
|
|
US7435261
|
CASTRO FRANK
|
Frank Castro
|
Oct 2008
|
|
US6656181
|
|
Robert A Dixon et al.
|
Dec 2003
|
|
US7637952
|
Zimmer Spine, Inc.
|
Michael E. Landry et al.
|
Dec 2009
|
|
US7267687
|
Rex Medical, L.P
|
James F. McGuckin, Jr.
|
Sep 2007
|
|
US7594931
|
LDR Medical
|
Christian Louis et al.
|
Sep 2009
|
|
US7615076
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Nov 2009
|
|
US7189235
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen
|
Mar 2007
|
|
US7875078
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Steve Wysocki et al.
|
Jan 2011
|
|
US7909879
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen
|
Mar 2011
|
|
US7905923
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Peter T. Keith et al.
|
Mar 2011
|
|
US7905885
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wes Johnson et al.
|
Mar 2011
|
|
US7662185
|
Osteotech, Inc.
|
Arthur A. Alfaro et al.
|
Feb 2010
|
|
US7670379
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen
|
Mar 2010
|
|
US7674278
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Richard J. Manzi et al.
|
Mar 2010
|
|
US7713301
|
Disc Dynamics, Inc.
|
Qi-Bin Bao et al.
|
May 2010
|
|
US7726002
|
Osteotech, Inc.
|
Lawrence A. Shimp et al.
|
Jun 2010
|
|
US7744637
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Jun 2010
|
|
US7749273
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Jul 2010
|
|
US7749255
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wes Johnson et al.
|
Jul 2010
|
|
US7753941
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Peter T. Keith et al.
|
Jul 2010
|
|
US7766965
|
Disc Dynamics, Inc.
|
Qi-Bin Bao et al.
|
Aug 2010
|
|
US7776093
|
Blackstone Medical, Inc.
|
Howard Wolek et al.
|
Aug 2010
|
|
US7780707
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wes Johnson et al.
|
Aug 2010
|
|
US7780734
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Aug 2010
|
|
US7780708
|
Osteotech, Inc.
|
John W. Morris et al.
|
Aug 2010
|
|
US7794500
|
|
Brent A. Felix
|
Sep 2010
|
|
US7799034
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Sep 2010
|
|
US7799081
|
Aeolin, LLC
|
Laurence M. McKinley
|
Sep 2010
|
|
US7811331
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Oct 2010
|
|
US7828850
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Nov 2010
|
|
US6926737
|
|
Roger P. Jackson
|
Aug 2005
|
|
US6843804
|
|
Donald W. Bryan
|
Jan 2005
|
|
US7503935
|
Kyphon SARL
|
James F. Zucherman et al.
|
Mar 2009
|
|
US7922768
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Apr 2011
|
|
US7935147
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Lawrence W. Wales
|
May 2011
|
|
US7931688
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Michael Landry et al.
|
Apr 2011
|
|
US7942932
|
Cardinal Spine, LLC
|
Frank Castro
|
May 2011
|
|
US7951201
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen et al.
|
May 2011
|
|
US7967867
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Peter Barreiro et al.
|
Jun 2011
|
|
US7963992
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Jun 2011
|
|
US7985257
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Jul 2011
|
|
US7985258
|
Warsaw Orthopedic Inc.
|
Thomas Zdeblick et al.
|
Jul 2011
|
|
US8002832
|
Cardinal Spine, LLC
|
Frank Castro
|
Aug 2011
|
|
US8002833
|
Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
|
Daniele A. Fabris Monterumici et al.
|
Aug 2011
|
|
US7993405
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Aug 2011
|
|
US8016887
|
Cardinal Spine, LLC
|
Frank Castro
|
Sep 2011
|
|
US8048160
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen
|
Nov 2011
|
|
US8034112
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Oct 2011
|
|
US8088165
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Joseph C. Cauthen, III et al.
|
Jan 2012
|
|
US8092536
|
Disc Dynamics, Inc.
|
Michael Ahrens et al.
|
Jan 2012
|
|
US8075623
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Dec 2011
|
|
US8070812
|
Cervitech, Inc.
|
Arnold Keller
|
Dec 2011
|
|
US8128698
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Ishmael Bentley et al.
|
Mar 2012
|
|
US8123755
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Feb 2012
|
|
US8241360
|
Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.
|
Qi-Bin Bao et al.
|
Aug 2012
|
|
US8241359
|
LDR Medical
|
Reginald James Davis et al.
|
Aug 2012
|
|
US8246683
|
Cardinal Spine, LLC
|
Frank Castro
|
Aug 2012
|
|
US8226718
|
Cardinal Spine, LLC
|
Frank Castro
|
Jul 2012
|
|
US8163022
|
Anulex Technologies, Inc.
|
Ishmael Bentley et al.
|
Apr 2012
|
|
US8206398
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Jun 2012
|
|
US8192493
|
Cervitech, Inc.
|
Arnold Keller
|
Jun 2012
|
|
US8262731
|
Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.
|
Matthew N. Songer et al.
|
Sep 2012
|
|
US8287599
|
Rex Medical, L.P.
|
James F. McGuckin, Jr.
|
Oct 2012
|
|
US8287572
|
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
|
Hyun W. Bae et al.
|
Oct 2012
|
|
US8142507
|
Rex Medical, L.P.
|
James F. McGuckin, Jr.
|
Mar 2012
|
|
US8333985
|
Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
|
David Knaack et al.
|
Dec 2012
|
|
US8349015
|
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
|
Hyun W. Bae et al.
|
Jan 2013
|
|
US8349014
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Peter Barreiro et al.
|
Jan 2013
|
|
US8343219
|
LDR Medical
|
Jrme Allain et al.
|
Jan 2013
|
|
US8343193
|
Spine Wave, Inc.
|
Wesley D. Johnson et al.
|
Jan 2013
|
Boliven’s Predicted Expiration Date includes in its calculation the number of days of patent term adjustment a U.S. patent is entitled. The Predicted Expiration Date does not, currently, include in its calculation the payment of maintenance fees, the filing of any disclaimer(s), and/or patent term extension, but Boliven is working to include this information in the near future.