Method and apparatus for deleting data upon expiration

Share
Save
Discuss
Claim

Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Share By Email
Save Item
Save Item
Add to
my lists

Filing Information

  • Patent Number: US7559088
  • Application Number: US11051952
  • Filing date: 02/04/2005
  • Issue date: 07/07/2009
  • Prior Publication Data:
  • Predicted expiration date: 04/10/2027
  • Patent term adjustment: 795
Explore Your Innovation Network™ for an introduction to:

Innovation Network Your First Name:
Last Name:
 
Already a member? Sign In
  • U.S. Classifications: 726/26  · 726/1  ·
  • International Classifications: H04L900 ·
  • Related U.S. Application Data:
    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
    This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application nos. 60/541,626 filed Feb. 4, 2004 and 60/542,011 filed Feb. 5, 2004, which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
  • View document at: (opens new window):
    USPTO  ·  PAIR  ·  esp@cenet  ·  Patent Family
    * Related patent documents may or may not exist on these sites
9 Claims, 3 Drawings


Abstract

A method and apparatus for efficiently deleting data including backup or snapshots upon expiration are disclosed. The data can be deleted even without physical access to the data. A data generation unit generates a data. Each data has an expiration time and should be deleted upon expiration. An encryption unit encrypts the data, and the encrypted data is stored in data storage. A controller monitors whether there is an expired data, and if there is an expired data, the controller deletes a key necessary for decrypting the expired data.

References Cited

U.S. Patent Documents

Document NumberAssigneesInventorsIssue/Pub Date
US4635145 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Horie et al. Jan 1987
US4727512 Computer Design & Applications, Inc. Birkner et al. Feb 1988
US4775969 Aquidneck Systems International, Inc. Osterlund Oct 1988
US5235695 International Business Machines Corporation Pence Aug 1993
US5269022 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Shinjo et al. Dec 1993
US5297124 Miltope Corporation Plotkin et al. Mar 1994
US5438674 Data/Ware Development, Inc. Keele et al. Aug 1995
US5455926 Data/Ware Development, Inc. Keele et al. Oct 1995
US5485321 Storage Technology Corporation Leonhardt et al. Jan 1996
US5666538 AST Research, Inc. DeNicola Sep 1997
US5673382 International Business Machines Corporation Cannon et al. Sep 1997
US5774292 International Business Machines Corporation Georgiou et al. Jun 1998
US5774643 Digital Equipment Corporation Lubbers et al. Jun 1998
US5774715 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Madany et al. Jun 1998
US5805864 International Business Machines Corporation Carlson et al. Sep 1998
US5809511 International Business Machines Corporation Peake Sep 1998
US5809543 Unisys Corporation Byers et al. Sep 1998
US5854720 Seagate Peripherals, Inc. Shrinkle et al. Dec 1998
US5857208 EMC Corporation Ofek Jan 1999
US5864346 Nintendo Co., Ltd. Yokoi et al. Jan 1999
US5872669 Seagate Technology, Inc. Morehouse et al. Feb 1999
US5875479 International Business Machines Corporation Blount et al. Feb 1999
US5911779 EMC Corporation Stallmo et al. Jun 1999
US5949970 Unisys Corporation Sipple et al. Sep 1999
US5961613 AST Research, Inc. DeNicola Oct 1999
US5963971 International Business Machines Corporation Fosler et al. Oct 1999
US5974424 International Business Machines Corporation Schmuck et al. Oct 1999
US6021408 Veritas Software Corp. Ledain et al. Feb 2000
US6023709 International Business Machines Corporation Anglin et al. Feb 2000
US6029179 International Business Machines Corporation Kishi Feb 2000
US6041329 International Business Machines Corporation Kishi Mar 2000
US6044442 International Business Machines Corporation Jesionowski Mar 2000
US6049848 Sutmyn Storage Corporation Yates et al. Apr 2000
US6061309 International Business Machines Corporation Gallo et al. May 2000
US6067587 Sutmyn Storage Corporation Miller et al. May 2000
US6070224 EMC Corporation LeCrone et al. May 2000
US6098148 International Business Machines Corporation Carlson Aug 2000
US6128698 Exabyte Corporation Georgis Oct 2000
US6131142 Ltd. Hitachi Kamo et al. Oct 2000
US6131148 International Business Machines Corporation West et al. Oct 2000
US6134660* Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Boneh et al. Oct 2000
US6163853 Micron Electronics, Inc. Dion et al. Dec 2000
US6163856 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Dion et al. Dec 2000
US6173293 Digital Equipment Corporation Thekkath et al. Jan 2001
US6173359 International Business Machines Corp. Carlson et al. Jan 2001
US6195730 Storage Technology Corporation West Feb 2001
US6225709 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Nakajima May 2001
US6247096 International Business Machines Corporation Fisher et al. Jun 2001
US6260110 EMC Corporation LeCrone et al. Jul 2001
US6266784 International Business Machines Corporation Hsiao et al. Jul 2001
US6269423 International Business Machines Corporation Kishi Jul 2001
US6269431 EMC Corporation Dunham Jul 2001
US6282609 International Business Machines Corporation Carlson Aug 2001
US6289425 Storage Technology Corporation Blendermann et al. Sep 2001
US6292889 Novadigm, Inc. Fitzgerald et al. Sep 2001
US6301677 Delta-Tek Research, Inc. Squibb Oct 2001
US6304880 International Business Machines Corporation Kishi Oct 2001
US6317814 Storage Technology Corporation Blendermann et al. Nov 2001
US6324497 Sutmyn Storage Corporation Yates et al. Nov 2001
US6327418 TiVo Inc. Barton Dec 2001
US6336163 International Business Machines Corporation Brewer et al. Jan 2002
US6336173 International Business Machines Corporation Day et al. Jan 2002
US6339778 International Business Machines Corporation Kishi Jan 2002
US6341329 EMC Corporation LeCrone et al. Jan 2002
US6343342 International Business Machiness Corporation Carlson Jan 2002
US6353837 EMC Corporation Blumenau Mar 2002
US6360232 International Business Machines Corporation Brewer et al. Mar 2002
US6389503 Exabyte Corporation Georgis et al. May 2002
US6397307 Legato Systems, Inc. Ohran May 2002
US6408359 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Ito et al. Jun 2002
US6487561 EMC Corporation Ofek et al. Nov 2002
US6496791 Yates et al. Dec 2002
US6499026 Aurigin Systems, Inc. Rivette et al. Dec 2002
US6557073 Fujitsu Limited Fujiwara Apr 2003
US6557089 International Business Machines Corporation Reed et al. Apr 2003
US6578120 International Business Machines Corporation Crockett et al. Jun 2003
US6615365 PowerQuest Corporation Jenevein et al. Sep 2003
US6625704 SANgate Systems, Inc. Winokur Sep 2003
US6654912 Network Appliance, Inc. Viswanathan et al. Nov 2003
US6658435 International Business Machines Corporation McCall Dec 2003
US6694447 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Leach et al. Feb 2004
US6725331 EMC Corporation Kedem Apr 2004
US6766520 Unisys Corporation Rieschl et al. Jul 2004
US6779057 International Business Machines Corporation Masters et al. Aug 2004
US6779058 International Business Machines Corporation Kishi et al. Aug 2004
US6779081 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Arakawa et al. Aug 2004
US6816941 International Business Machines Corporation Carlson et al. Nov 2004
US6816942 Fujitsu Limited Okada et al. Nov 2004
US6834324 Storage Technology Corporation Wood Dec 2004
US6850964 Novell, Inc. Brough et al. Feb 2005
US6877016 Unisys Corporation Hart et al. Apr 2005
US6898600* International Business Machines Corporation Fruchtman et al. May 2005
US6915397 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Lubbers et al. Jul 2005
US6931557 Fujitsu Limited Togawa Aug 2005
US6950263 Hitachi, Ltd. Suzuki et al. Sep 2005
US6973369 Alacritus, Inc. Trimmer et al. Dec 2005
US6973534 International Business Machines Corporation Dawson et al. Dec 2005
US6978283 Network Appliance, Inc. Edwards et al. Dec 2005
US6978325 International Business Machines Corporation Gibble et al. Dec 2005
US7020779* Sun Microsystems, Inc. Sutherland Mar 2006
US7032126 Softek Storage Solutions Corporation Zalewski et al. Apr 2006
US7055009 International Business Machines Corporation Factor et al. May 2006
US7072910 Network Appliance, Inc. Kahn et al. Jul 2006
US7096331 EMC Corporation Haase et al. Aug 2006
US7100089 3PARdata, Inc. Phelps Aug 2006
US7111136 Hitachi, Ltd. Yamagami Sep 2006
US7111194 Network Appliance, Inc. Schoenthal et al. Sep 2006
US7127388 Advanced Digital Information Corporation Yates et al. Oct 2006
US7127577 Equallogic Inc. Koning et al. Oct 2006
US7152077 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Veitch et al. Dec 2006
US7152078 Hitachi, Ltd. Yamagami Dec 2006
US7155465 LEE HOWARD F Lee et al. Dec 2006
US7155586 EMC Corporation Wagner et al. Dec 2006
US7200726 Network Appliance, Inc. Gole et al. Apr 2007
US7203726 Yamaha Corporation Hasegawa et al. Apr 2007
US7346623 CommVault Systems, Inc. Prahlad et al. Mar 2008
US20010047447 Katsuda Nov 2001
US20020004835 INRANGE Technologies Corporation Yarbrough Jan 2002
US20020016827 McCabe et al. Feb 2002
US20020026595 NEC CORPORATION Saitou et al. Feb 2002
US20020091670 Hitz et al. Jul 2002
US20020095557 Constable et al. Jul 2002
US20020144057 Data Domain Li et al. Oct 2002
US20020163760 Lindsay et al. Nov 2002
US20020166079 Ulrich et al. Nov 2002
US20020199129 International Business Machines Corp. Bohrer et al. Dec 2002
US20030004980 International Business Machines Corporation Kishi et al. Jan 2003
US20030005313 Gammel et al. Jan 2003
US20030037211 Winokur Feb 2003
US20030046260 Satyanarayanan et al. Mar 2003
US20030120476 Yates et al. Jun 2003
US20030120676 Sanrise Group, Inc. Holavanahalli et al. Jun 2003
US20030126136 Omoigui Jul 2003
US20030126388 Hitachi, Ltd. Yamagami Jul 2003
US20030135672 Imation Corp. Yip et al. Jul 2003
US20030149700 Bolt Aug 2003
US20030158766 i2 Technologies US, Inc. Mital et al. Aug 2003
US20030182301 Patterson et al. Sep 2003
US20030182350 International Business Machines Corporation Dewey Sep 2003
US20030188208 Amphus, Inc. Fung Oct 2003
US20030217077 Schwartz et al. Nov 2003
US20030225800 Kavuri Dec 2003
US20040015731 International Business Machines Corporation Chu et al. Jan 2004
US20040098244 Imation Corp. Dailey et al. May 2004
US20040103147 Flesher et al. May 2004
US20040167903 Permabit, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation Margolus et al. Aug 2004
US20040181388 Yip et al. Sep 2004
US20040181707 Hitachi, Ltd. Fujibayashi Sep 2004
US20050010529 Zalewski et al. Jan 2005
US20050044162 Liang et al. Feb 2005
US20050063374 Revivio, Inc. Rowan et al. Mar 2005
US20050065962 Revivio, Inc. Rowan et al. Mar 2005
US20050066118 Perry et al. Mar 2005
US20050066222 Revivio, Inc. Rowan et al. Mar 2005
US20050066225 Rowan et al. Mar 2005
US20050076070 Mikami Apr 2005
US20050076261 Revivio, Inc. Rowan et al. Apr 2005
US20050076262 Revivio, Inc. Rowan et al. Apr 2005
US20050076264 Rowan et al. Apr 2005
US20050097260 McGovern et al. May 2005
US20050108302 Rand et al. May 2005
US20050144407 Colgrove et al. Jun 2005
US20050182910 Alacritus, Inc. Stager et al. Aug 2005
US20050240813 OKADA WATARU Okada et al. Oct 2005
US20060010177 KODAMA SHOJI Kodama Jan 2006
US20060047895 ROWAN MICHAEL Rowan et al. Mar 2006
US20060047902 PASSERINI RON Passerini Mar 2006
US20060047903 PASSERINI RON Passerini Mar 2006
US20060047905 MATZE JOHN E Matze et al. Mar 2006
US20060047925 PERRY ROBERT Perry Mar 2006
US20060047989 DELGADO DIANE Delgado et al. Mar 2006
US20060047998 DARCY JEFF Darcy Mar 2006
US20060047999 PASSERINI RON Passerini et al. Mar 2006
US20060143376 MATZE JOHN E Matze et al. Jun 2006
US20060259160 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Hood et al. Nov 2006

Foreign Patent Documents

Document NumberAssigneesInventorsIssue/Pub Date
CA2256934IBM CANADAJun 2000
EP0845733SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.Jun 1998
EP0869460PITNEY BOWES INC.Oct 1998
EP1058254Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Dec 2000
EP1122910MITSUBISHI CORPORATIONAug 2001
EP1233414Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Aug 2002
EP1333379QUANTUM CORPORATIONApr 2006
EP1671231Revivio Inc.Jun 2006
EP1671231Revivio Inc.Jun 2006
WO199903098SUTMYN STORAGE CORPJan 1999
WO199906912EXABYTE CORPFeb 1999
WO200118633N.V. FILEPOOLMar 2001
WO2003067438INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AGAug 2003
WO2004084010NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.Sep 2004
WO2005031576REVIVIO, INC.Apr 2005
WO2006023990REVIVIO, INC.Mar 2006
WO2006023991REVIVIO, INC.Mar 2006
WO2006023992REVIVIO, INC.Mar 2006
WO2006023993REVIVIO, INC.Mar 2006
WO2006023994REVIVIO, INC.Mar 2006
WO2006023995REVIVO, INC.Mar 2006
* cited by examiner

Other Publications

“Alacritus Software's Securitus I: Pointing the Way to Virtual Tape Libraries” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Mar. 2002.
“Continuous Data Protection: Business Continuity for the Era of Networked Storage: An Executive White Paper” Aberdeen Group, Inc. Jul. 2003.
“Alacritus Software's Chronospan: Make Time for Continuous Data Protection” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Oct. 2003.
Hill, David “Alacritus Software's Securitus: Defining the Way to Virtual Tape Libraries” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Jul. 2003.
“Alacritus Software's Securitus: Defining the Way to Virtual Tape Libraries” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Jul. 2003.
“Product Brief: Rhapsody/Alacritus-Secritus/XPath Virtual Tape in the Fabric” The Enterprise Storage Group, Aug. 2002.
“Alacritus Software Announces Securitus I, The Industry's First Virtual Tape Library Solution: Securitus I Heralds Advent of 'Disruptive Technology' that Serves as Replacement to Tape Libraries” Alacritus Software, Inc., Jun. 25, 2001.
“Alacritus, Hitachi CP and Nissho Team to Create Virtual Tape Library Appliance: Industry's First Virtual Tape Library Appliance to Replace Storage Tape Libraries” Alacritus Software, Inc., Jun. 25, 2001.
“Hitachi CP, Nissho, and Alacritus Software Bring Virtual Tape Library Appliance Solution to Market: Three Companies Join to Deliver VTLA Smart Guard—A Disk Subsystem Product that Functions as a Virtual Storage Tape Library” Alacritus Software, Inc., Oct. 3, 2001.
Trimmer, Don, “Tape Free Backup/Recovery: Requirements and Advantages: Virtualization Technology Will Encompass Many Applications, One of the Most Significant Possibly Being Backup/Recovery” InfoStor, Mar. 2002.
“Alacritus Software Announces Virtual Tape Library Support for Legato NetWorker Data Protection Solution” Alacritus Software, Inc., Jan. 8, 2002.
Camphuisen, Alicia, “Hitachi Inks OEM Deal with Legato” Knapp Comm., Jul. 17, 2002.
“Alacritus Announces Disk-Based Successor to Tape” Knapp Comm., Aug. 21, 2002.
Biggar, Heidi, “Alacritus Enables Disk-Based Backup” InfoStor, Sep. 2001.
“Securitus I White Paper: Disk Based Data Protection from Alacritus Software” Alacritus Software, Inc., Jul. 2001.
“Alacritus Software FAQs” Alacritus Software, Inc., Jul. 2001.
“Disk-Based Data Protection” Alacritus Software, Inc., Jul. 2001.
“Virtual Tape Library Technology Brochure” Alacritus Software, Inc., Jul. 2001.
“Disk-Based Data Protection” Alacritus Software, Inc., Sep. 2001.
“Disk-Based Data Protection” Alacritus Software, Inc., Sep. 2002.
Payack, Paul JJ, “Alacritus Lines Up OEM Partners for Virtual Tape Library Push” The (451) Storage & Systems, Oct. 4, 2002.
Payack, Paul JJ, “Alacritus Software Announces Continuous Data Protection with New Chronospan Technology” Oct. 28, 2003.
Payack, Paul JJ, “Alacritus Software Announces New Customers for Securitus VTLA” Alacritus Software, Jan. 13, 2004.
Baltazar, Henry “Weaving Apps Into SAN Fabric” eWeek, Mar. 24, 2003.
Baltazar, Henry “More Intelligence is on the Way” eWeek, Sep. 15, 2003.
Barrett, Alex “The Case for Network Smarts” Storage Magazine, Jun. 2003.
“Securitus White Paper: Disk Based Data Protection from Alacritus Software” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Manageability: Securitus v. Tape” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“The SNIA Data Management Forum Created to Tackle Data Protection and Information Lifecycle Management Issues: Enhanced Backup Solutions Initiative Rolls Efforts into New SNIA Forum” Storage Networking Industry Association, Oct. 13, 2003.
“No Changes Required: Securitus v. Tape” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Customer Success” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Chronospan” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Alacritus Software Announces Securitus I, the Industry's First Virtual Tape Library Solution: Securitus I Heralds Advent of 'Disruptive Technology' that Serves as Replacement to Tape Libraries” Alacritus Software, Inc., Apr. 9, 2002.
Biggar, Heidi, “Disk and Tape Forge New Partnership in Backup Arena” InfoStor, Nov. 2001.
Preston, W. Curtis, “Surprise! Cheap Disks Cure Slow Backup” Storage Magazine, Jun. 1, 2002.
“Alacritus, Hitachi CP and Nissho Team to Create Virtual Tape Library” internetnews.com, Jun. 25, 2001.
“Alacritus Software and Rhapsody Networks to Develop Breakthrough Backup Solutions for Storage Networks: Companies to Provide First Network-Intelligent Virtual Tape Solution Resulting in Dramatic ROI, Increases in Data Backup Performance and Scalability” Alacritus Software, Jul. 8, 2002.
Komiega, Kevin, “Vendor Pushes Disk Backup Over Tape” SearchStorage.com Jan. 10, 2003.
“Testimonials” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Seamless Integration” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Topologies” Alacritus Website, Oct. 7, 2003.
“Securitus” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Scalability: Securitus v. Tape” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Strengths: Securitus v. Tape” Alacritus Website, Oct. 2003.
“Alacritus Creates 'Next Critical Step' in Disaster Recovery for Patrick Air Force Base, Securitus VTL Sets the Pace”, Apr. 20, 2004.
“Alacritus to Demonstrate Chronospan CDP with the Brocade Fabric Application Platform at Storage Networking World”, Apr. 1, 2004.
“Alacritus to Demo Chronospan Continuous Data Protection with the Cisco MDS 9000”, Apr. 1, 2004.
“Alacritus and Network Appliance Deliver Advanced Virtual Tape Library, Solution Shortens Backup Windows, Accelerates Data Recovery, and Simplifies Backup Management”, Dec. 7, 2004.
“Cisco and Storage ISVs to Demo Protocol-Based Interface between Storage Appliances and the Cisco MDS 9000”, Mar. 30, 2004.
“Case Study Shizuoka-ken Noukyou Densan Center K.K., Reducing Management Costs Through Tapeless Backup At An iDC”, Apr. 7, 2004.
“Alacritus Software's Securitus I: Pointing the Way to Virtual Tape Libraries” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Mar. 2002.
“Continuous Data Protection: Business Continuity for the Era of Networked Storage: An Executive White Paper” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Jul. 2003.
“Alacritus Software's Chronospan: Make Time for Continuous Data Protection” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Oct. 2003.
Hill, David “Alacritus Software's Securitus: Defining the Way to Virtual Tape Libraries” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Jul. 2003.
“Alacritus Software's Securitus: Defining the Way to Virtual Tape Libraries” Aberdeen Group, Inc., Jul. 2003.
“Alacritus Creates ‘Next Critical Step’ in Disaster Recovery for Patrick Air Force Base, Securitus VTL Sets the Pace”, Apr. 20, 2004.
“Alacritus to Demonstrate Chronospan CDP with the Brocade Fabric Application Platform at Storage Networking World”, Apr. 1, 2004.
“Alacritus to Demo Chronospan Continuous Data Protection with the Cisco MDS 9000”, Apr. 1, 2004.
“Alacritus and Network Appliance Deliver Advanced Virtual Tape Library, Solution Shortens Backup Windows, Accelerates Data Recovery, and Simplifies backup Management”, Dec. 7, 2004.
“Cisco and Storage ISVs to Demo Protocol-Based Interface between Storage Appliances and the Cisco MDS 9000”, Mar. 30, 2004.
“Case Study Shizuoka-ken Noukyou Densan Center K.K., Reducing Management Costs Through tapeless Backup At An iDC”, Apr. 7, 2004.
Joan Daemen et al., “AES Proposal: Rijndael”, The Rijndael Block Cipher, Document Version 2, Mar. 1999, 45 pages.
Joan Daemen et al., “Note on Naming”, Rijndael, Sep. 4, 2003, 2 pages.
Decru, “Decru Datafort E-Series Storage Security Appliances, Transparant Data Security for Network Attached Storage (NAS)”, 2004, 2 pages.
Simon L. Garfinkel et al., “Rememberance of Data Passed: A Study of Disk Sanitization Practices”, IEEE Security and Privacy, vol. 1, No. 1, 2003 19 pages.
Hatfield. “Write Read Verify Feature Set”, May 14, 2004.
Chris Lueth, “Worm Storage on Magnetic Disks Using SnapLock Compliance™and SnapLock Enterprise™”, Network Applicance, Inc., Sep. 2003, sections 1-5 13 pages.
“Network Appliance Worm Storage Solution: SEC 17 a-4(f) Compliance Assessment”, Network Appliance, Inc., Jul. 10, 2003, pp. 1-20.
Novell NetWare Server Disks And Storage Devices Administration Guide. Netware 5.1, Jan. 2000, pp. 1-60.

Referenced By

The current document is not referenced by other documents.

Patent Family

The current document is not in a family.

Claims 

  1. 1. A method for managing expiration operations of a backup management system to render expired backup data inaccessible, the method comprising: generating backup data from original data contained in a primary data volume as indicated by a data backup policy, wherein the data backup policy governs generation, storage, and expiration of the backup data; storing the backup data in a backup storage unit and encrypting the backup data, wherein the backup data but not the original data is encrypted; storing a decryption key and an associated expiration time in an encryption storage unit for each of a plurality of backup data, wherein: the decryption key is for decrypting the encrypted data; the expiration time is indicated by the data backup policy and indicates the time at which each of the plurality of backup data should be rendered inaccessible; a first backup data and a second backup data of the plurality of backup data are assigned an identical decryption key when the first backup data and the second backup data have an identical expiration time; the first backup data and the second backup data are assigned distinct decryption keys when the first backup data and the second backup data have different expiration times; and deleting the decryption key at a time indicated by the expiration time for each of the plurality of backup data, such that an expired backup data becomes inaccessible even if the expired backup data is not deleted from the backup storage unit.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the backup data is a snapshot of the original data.
  3. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the backup data is a backup copy stored on a tape or a virtual tape.
  4. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein each backup data is encrypted using a different encryption key.
  5. 5. An apparatus for managing expiration operations of a backup management system to render expired backup data inaccessible, the apparatus comprising: a data generation unit to generate backup data from original data contained in a primary data volume, wherein a data backup policy governs generation, storage, and expiration of the backup data; an encryption unit to encrypt the backup data, wherein the encryption unit encrypts the backup data but not the original data; a backup storage unit to store the encrypted backup data; an encryption storage unit to store a decryption key and an expiration time for each of a plurality of backup data, wherein: the decryption key is for decrypting the encrypted data; the expiration time is indicated by the data backup policy and indicates the time and which each of the plurality of backup data should be rendered inaccessible; a first backup data and a second backup data of the plurality of backup data are assigned an identical decryption key when the first backup data and the second backup data have an identical expiration time; the first backup data and the second backup data are assigned distinct decryption keys when the first backup data and the second backup data have different expiration times; and a controller to delete the decryption key at a time indicated by the expiration time for each of the plurality of backup data, such that an expired backup data becomes inaccessible even if the expired backup data is not deleted from the backup storage unit.
  6. 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the backup data is a snapshot of the original data.
  7. 7. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the backup data is a backup copy stored on a tape or a virtual tape.
  8. 8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein each backup data is encrypted using a different encryption key.
  9. 9. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the backup data targeted to expire during the same period are encrypted using the same encryption key.

Full Specification

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application nos. 60/541,626 filed Feb. 4, 2004 and 60/542,011 filed Feb. 5, 2004, which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.





FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to data generation and deletion. More particularly, the present invention is a method and apparatus for deleting data efficiently upon expiration. The present invention can be applied to any kind of data stored in any kind of system.

BACKGROUND

Backing up data is a process that generates a coherent copy of data. Backing up data has become more important as the amount of data has exploded in volume and the importance of electronic records has also greatly increased. Backups are performed for various reasons, such as to assure availability of data, to generate data archival, or to transport data to a distant location.

Many schemes have been developed to generate backup data. One data backup scheme is to generate point-in-time (PIT) copies of data. PIT copies which are generated are either hardware-based or software-based. A hardware-based PIT copy is a mirror of a primary volume which has been saved onto a secondary volume. A software-based PIT copy, called a “snapshot,” is a “picture” of a volume at the block level or a file system at the operating system level. Another data backup scheme is where a backup application sends full or incremental copies of data to tape.

Backup data is generated in accordance with a data backup policy. Backup copies are generated and stored in a storage media, and maintained for a certain period of time. Often, not only is a single copy generated, but multiple copies of one original data are generated and maintained in separate media. Because of regulatory requirements, companies have to keep certain backup copies for several years. Accordingly, the data backup policy typically sets an expiration time for each backup data. For example, a system may retain daily snapshots or backups for two months, weekly snapshots or backups for two years and monthly snapshots or backups for seven years. Once the expiration time has passed, the backup copies are deleted completely from record, and should not be available in the future.

Historically, magnetic tape has been used as the storage medium for backing up data because tape has been a much cheaper medium than a disk. In order to completely delete backup data stored in a tape, a system operator typically needs to access each tape through the backup application, delete the backup data in question, and run another backup procedure on the tape. This is a labor-intensive and expensive process. This is even more complicated if only certain pieces of data on the tape need to be expired or if the tape can not be easily located.

One problem with these prior art scenarios is that even after the expiration time, many copies across many tapes are not deleted completely and are still in existence. This may cause a problem. For example, when critical data that should have been deleted is obtained by an adversary in a lawsuit, this may cause a tremendous damage to companies.

Therefore, there is a need to efficiently and completely delete all expired data from record in a way that it is no longer recoverable. This is the case even when it is not easy to obtain direct access to the data.

SUMMARY

A method and apparatus for deleting data including backup data or snapshots upon expiration are disclosed. The present invention can be applied even where it is not possible to gain physical access to the data. A data generation unit generates data, (including backup data or snapshots). Each data has an expiration time which sets forth the desired time that the data will be deleted. An encryption unit encrypts the data, and the encrypted data is stored in a storage. A controller monitors whether an expiration time has passed and, if so the controller deletes a key necessary for decrypting the expired data.







BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more detailed understanding of the invention may be had from the following description of a preferred embodiment, given by way of example, and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIGS. 1A-1C are block diagrams of a data backup system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a data protection unit in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of process for deleting data upon expiration in accordance with the present invention.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention will be described with reference to the drawing FIGS. wherein like numerals represent like elements throughout.

FIG. 1A shows an example of a data backup system 100 that can be implemented in accordance with the present invention. The system 100 comprises a host computer 102, a primary data volume 104 (the primary data volume may also be referred to as a protected volume), a data protection unit 106, and a secondary data volume 108. The host computer 102 is coupled to the primary data volume 104 and to the data protection unit 106. The data protection unit 106 manages the secondary data volume 108, and generates and maintains backup data for data stored in the primary data volume 104. The configuration of the system 100 minimizes the lag time by writing directly to the primary data volume 104 and permits the data protection unit 106 to focus exclusively on managing the secondary data volume 108.

It should be noted that the primary data volume 104 and the secondary data volume 108 can be any type of data storage, including, but not limited to, a single disk, a disk array (such as a RAID), a tape drive, a tape library or a storage area network (SAN). The main difference between the primary data volume 104 and the secondary data volume 108 lies in the type of data that is stored on the device. The primary volume 104 is typically an expensive, fast, and highly available storage subsystem that stores the primary copy of the data, whereas the secondary volume 108 is typically a cost-effective, high capacity, and comparatively slow (for example, tape, ATA/SATA disks) storage subsystem that stores backup copies of the data.

FIG. 1B shows an alternative example of a system 120 that can be implemented in accordance with the present invention. The host computer 102 is directly connected to the data protection unit 106, which manages both the primary data volume 104 and the secondary data volume 108. The system 120 may be slower than the system 100 described with reference to FIG. 1A since the data protection unit 106 must manage both the primary data volume 104 and the secondary data volume 108. Although slower operation results in a higher latency for writes to the primary volume 104 in the system 120 and lowers the available bandwidth for use, such a configuration as shown in FIG. 1B may be acceptable in certain applications.

FIG. 1C shows another example of a system 140 that can be implemented in accordance with the present invention. The host computer 102 is connected to an intelligent switch 142. The switch 142 is connected to the primary data volume 104 and the data protection unit 106 which, in turn, manages the secondary data volume 108. The switch 142 includes the ability to host applications and contains some of the functionality of the data protection unit 106 in hardware, to assist in reducing system latency and improve bandwidth.

It should be noted that the configurations of the system shown in FIGS. 1A-1C are provided as an example, not as a limitation. The present invention can be applied not only to data backup systems but also to any kind of data generation system in which the generated data may need to be expired at some point. Hereinafter including FIGS. 2 and 3, the present invention will be explained with reference to a data backup system. However, it should be noted that it is obvious for those skilled in the art that the present can be equally applied to any data generation system and any kind of data, not limited to data backup system or backup data. Any other configuration, (e.g. a typical backup system, a virtual tape library or any other data generation system), may be implemented, and the data protection unit 106 operates in the same manner regardless of the particular configuration of the system 100, 120, 140. It should be also noted that the present invention may utilize only one data volume, instead of two, for storing an original data and/or a backup data. The primary difference between these examples is the manner and place in which a copy of each write is obtained. To those skilled in the art, it is evident that other embodiments, such as the cooperation between a switch platform and an external server, are also feasible. Accordingly, although two data volumes are shown, a single data volume may be used. Additionally, although two data volumes may be used, they may be stored on a single storage device.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the data protection unit 106 in accordance with the present invention. Backup data is generated, stored and deleted in accordance with a data backup policy. It should be noted that it is obvious to those skilled in the art that the present invention can be applied to any kind of data that needs to be retained and then expired, (e.g. archival data, financial data, email data, etc.). The data protection unit 106 controls generating, storing and deleting of backup data. The data protection unit 106 comprises a controller 112, a backup data generation unit 114, an encryption unit 116, and an encryption key storage 118.

The controller 112 provides overall control of generating, storing, and deleting backup data. The backup data generation unit 114 generates backup data, such as snapshots, under the control of the controller 112 as desired under the backup policy. The backup data is stored in a storage unit, such as a secondary volume 108 or tape. The backup data is input into the encryption unit 116. The encryption unit 116 performs both encryption of the backup data, and subsequent decryption of the encrypted backup data as necessary. Therefore, encrypted backup data is stored in storage, and the encrypted backup data may be restored from the storage in case of system failure. Encryption is performed by any means which is currently available or will be developed in the future.

The encryption unit 116 encrypts the backup data using an encryption key. The encryption key may be either a symmetric key or an asymmetric key. If a symmetric key is used, a same key is required for both encryption and decryption. If an asymmetric key is used, a pair of keys is used for encryption and decryption. The encryption unit 116 uses different encryption/decryption keys for each backup data block.

As the backup data generation unit 114 generates a backup copy, the encryption unit 116 generates a new encryption key and performs encryption on the new backup data using the new encryption key.

Alternatively, the encryption unit 116 may use same encryption/decryption keys for backup data having same expiration date. For example, if the backup data generation unit 114 generates twenty four (24) hourly snapshots and only one (1) snapshot is kept as a weekly snapshot, the encryption unit 116 may use same encryption/decryption keys for twenty three (23) snapshots and use different key for the other one (1) snapshot, so that the twenty three (23) hourly snapshots may be deleted at the same time by just deleting the common decryption key for the twenty three (23) hourly snapshots, which will be explained in detail hereinafter.

The encryption/decryption key is preferably separately stored and maintained in an encryption key storage 118. The encryption key storage 118 contains a list of the backup data blocks, related encryption and decryption keys necessary for encrypting and decrypting the backup data, and an expiration time for each backup data block.

Each backup data block is assigned an individual expiration time. The controller 112 monitors whether there is any expired backup data. If there is expired backup data, the controller 112 deletes the decryption key for the expired backup data from the encryption key storage 118, so that the encrypted backup data may not be decrypted in the future. The backup data itself may or may not be deleted. However, without the decryption key, the encrypted backup data is unreadable and therefore irretrievable.

A process 300 for data backup will be explained with reference to the flow diagram of FIG. 3. The process 300 deletes backup data efficiently upon expiration in accordance with the present invention. The backup data generation unit 114 creates backup data in accordance with a data backup policy (step 302). The encryption unit 116 encrypts the backup data before storing the backup data in storage (step 304). A controller 112 stores encryption/decryption key for the encrypted backup data along with an expiration time of the backup data in an encryption key storage 118. The controller 112 monitors whether there is an expired backup data (step 306). If the controller 112 identifies expired backup data, the controller 112 identifies a decryption key necessary for decrypting the expired backup data and deletes the key from the encryption key storage 118 (step 308). With this scheme, a data backup system can delete expired backup data efficiently, and the expired backup data is completely unrecoverable.

While specific embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, many modifications and variations could be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. The above description serves to illustrate and not limit the particular invention in any way. As stated hereinabove, the present invention may be applied to any data which needs to be deleted upon expiration, not just backup data, and any data generation system, not just backup systems, and it should be understood that such applications are obvious to those skilled in the art.